https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344859 The Tribunal partly allowed the petition, directing that the agenda for R-9's continuation as Director/Executive Director be placed before a shareholders' meeting for approval, chaired by Mr. Suvir Sehgal, Advocate, with Ms. Meenakshi Gupta as the Scrutinizer. The rest of the petition, including challenges to the Deed of Adherence, appointments of Directors, allegations of oppression and mismanagement, and consideration of exit for the petitioners, was dismissed. en-us Mon, 22 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Jun 2017 07:09:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344859 The Tribunal partly allowed the petition, directing that the agenda for R-9's continuation as Director/Executive Director be placed before a shareholders' meeting for approval, chaired by Mr. Suvir Sehgal, Advocate, with Ms. Meenakshi Gupta as the Scrutinizer. The rest of the petition, including challenges to the Deed of Adherence, appointments of Directors, allegations of oppression and mismanagement, and consideration of exit for the petitioners, was dismissed. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 22 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344859