<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (4) TMI 32 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8592</link>
    <description>Reassessment under sections 147 and 148 requires the assessing officer to have reasons to believe, based on material, that income escaped assessment because of the assessee&#039;s failure to make a full and true disclosure of primary facts. Disclosed balance-sheets, directors&#039; reports and profit and loss accounts formed part of the return and showed the relevant sales and internal consumption figures, so the primary facts were already before the officer. A later reappraisal of the same facts on a different view of law amounted only to a change of opinion, which could not sustain reopening. The notices were therefore invalid and the reassessment proceedings failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 16:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (4) TMI 32 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8592</link>
      <description>Reassessment under sections 147 and 148 requires the assessing officer to have reasons to believe, based on material, that income escaped assessment because of the assessee&#039;s failure to make a full and true disclosure of primary facts. Disclosed balance-sheets, directors&#039; reports and profit and loss accounts formed part of the return and showed the relevant sales and internal consumption figures, so the primary facts were already before the officer. A later reappraisal of the same facts on a different view of law amounted only to a change of opinion, which could not sustain reopening. The notices were therefore invalid and the reassessment proceedings failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>