<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1123 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344852</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the assessee&#039;s deduction under Section 80-IA and claimed depreciation under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following jurisdictional High Court rulings and determining the actual cost based on market value, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s contentions on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2017 14:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=476123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1123 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344852</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the assessee&#039;s deduction under Section 80-IA and claimed depreciation under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following jurisdictional High Court rulings and determining the actual cost based on market value, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s contentions on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>