<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1116 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344845</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the additions made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A) regarding the capital contributions by partners and the unsecured loan raised from the creditor. The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee based on legal precedents and explanations provided, ultimately deleting the additions and ruling them as unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2017 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=476116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1116 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344845</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the additions made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A) regarding the capital contributions by partners and the unsecured loan raised from the creditor. The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee based on legal precedents and explanations provided, ultimately deleting the additions and ruling them as unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>