<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1114 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344843</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the department&#039;s appeals for A.Ys. 2010-11 and 2011-12, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s deletions of various disallowances and additions. The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2011-12, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s confirmation of disallowance of prior period expenditure. The judgment emphasizes the importance of consistency in tax treatment across years and adherence to judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 12:52:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=476114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1114 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344843</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the department&#039;s appeals for A.Ys. 2010-11 and 2011-12, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s deletions of various disallowances and additions. The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2011-12, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s confirmation of disallowance of prior period expenditure. The judgment emphasizes the importance of consistency in tax treatment across years and adherence to judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>