<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1112 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344841</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) in the case, ruling that there was a close connection between the assessee and another entity, indicating a scheme to inflate profits for higher deductions under Section 80IC. The Tribunal deemed the 30% net profit rate set by the CIT(A) as reasonable, providing relief to the assessee while addressing concerns of profit manipulation. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the application of a 30% net profit rate for the deduction under Section 80IC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 12:52:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=476112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1112 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344841</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) in the case, ruling that there was a close connection between the assessee and another entity, indicating a scheme to inflate profits for higher deductions under Section 80IC. The Tribunal deemed the 30% net profit rate set by the CIT(A) as reasonable, providing relief to the assessee while addressing concerns of profit manipulation. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the application of a 30% net profit rate for the deduction under Section 80IC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>