<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1108 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344837</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit accumulated in a 100% EOU was held transferable to a connected service division for payment of service tax on output services, as no statutory prohibition barred such utilisation and the arrangement was treated as revenue neutral. The demand on that credit-utilisation issue was set aside. Penalties were also held unsustainable because the assessee&#039;s conduct did not show wilful suppression or contumacious evasion, so the ingredients for penal action were not made out. The appeal thus succeeded on the principal credit issue and on penalties, while the uncontested service tax component remained outside dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 12:52:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=476108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1108 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344837</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit accumulated in a 100% EOU was held transferable to a connected service division for payment of service tax on output services, as no statutory prohibition barred such utilisation and the arrangement was treated as revenue neutral. The demand on that credit-utilisation issue was set aside. Penalties were also held unsustainable because the assessee&#039;s conduct did not show wilful suppression or contumacious evasion, so the ingredients for penal action were not made out. The appeal thus succeeded on the principal credit issue and on penalties, while the uncontested service tax component remained outside dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>