https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344836 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that their work did not fall under the categories of construction service or commercial and industrial construction service for the period 2004-05 to 2008-09. The demand for service tax, penalties, and interest was deemed unsustainable as the appellant's work constituted a works contract not taxable before a certain date. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned orders, and granting the appellant consequential benefits in accordance with the law. en-us Mon, 05 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Jun 2017 12:52:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344836 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that their work did not fall under the categories of construction service or commercial and industrial construction service for the period 2004-05 to 2008-09. The demand for service tax, penalties, and interest was deemed unsustainable as the appellant's work constituted a works contract not taxable before a certain date. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned orders, and granting the appellant consequential benefits in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 05 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344836