<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1100 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344829</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by the Judicial Member, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order modifying CENVAT credit on various services. The appellant was granted credit on services directly related to the manufacturing business but was required to provide additional documents for Management Consultancy Fee for further evaluation by the original authority. The case was remanded back for reevaluation based on the additional documentation provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=476100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1100 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344829</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by the Judicial Member, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order modifying CENVAT credit on various services. The appellant was granted credit on services directly related to the manufacturing business but was required to provide additional documents for Management Consultancy Fee for further evaluation by the original authority. The case was remanded back for reevaluation based on the additional documentation provided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>