<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1099 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344828</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by M/s U. P. State Spinning Co. Ltd., setting aside the Order-in-Original and Order-in-Appeal. The Tribunal held that the transportation costs from the factory gate to the depot/consignment agents were deductible, deeming the Show Cause Notice unsustainable. The appellant was entitled to consequential relief as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 12:51:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=476099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1099 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344828</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by M/s U. P. State Spinning Co. Ltd., setting aside the Order-in-Original and Order-in-Appeal. The Tribunal held that the transportation costs from the factory gate to the depot/consignment agents were deductible, deeming the Show Cause Notice unsustainable. The appellant was entitled to consequential relief as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>