<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1093 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344822</link>
    <description>Education cess, as a surcharge on existing duties, cannot be levied again on an amount that already includes such cess, because that would amount to double taxation without statutory sanction. Applying the binding Larger Bench view under the Finance Act, 2004 and the Finance Act, 2007, the text states that levy of education cess on education cess was impermissible, and the refund of excess cess paid was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=476093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1093 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344822</link>
      <description>Education cess, as a surcharge on existing duties, cannot be levied again on an amount that already includes such cess, because that would amount to double taxation without statutory sanction. Applying the binding Larger Bench view under the Finance Act, 2004 and the Finance Act, 2007, the text states that levy of education cess on education cess was impermissible, and the refund of excess cess paid was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>