<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1404 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192894</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s deduction for gratuity payment, loss on valuation of mutual funds, and interest on non-performing assets (NPAs). However, the disallowance of provision for standard assets and claim under Section 36(1)(viia) was upheld. The additional deduction for salary arrears was remitted for reconsideration, while the Revenue&#039;s appeal on broken period interest and provision for staff frauds was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 12:50:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=476079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1404 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192894</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s deduction for gratuity payment, loss on valuation of mutual funds, and interest on non-performing assets (NPAs). However, the disallowance of provision for standard assets and claim under Section 36(1)(viia) was upheld. The additional deduction for salary arrears was remitted for reconsideration, while the Revenue&#039;s appeal on broken period interest and provision for staff frauds was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>