https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192880 A revenue court hearing a suit under Section 209 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act may award damages where the substantive provision contemplates ejectment and damages, even if the original Schedule entry omitted express reference to damages. Concurrent factual findings that the defendants were trespassers and were not in possession with the plaintiff's consent are treated as findings of fact and are not ordinarily open to interference. A later procedural amendment making the State a necessary party was not applied so as to unsettle a decree already obtained and pending in appeal, and the absence of the State did not defeat the appeal or disturb the accrued position. en-us Thu, 18 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Jun 2017 17:25:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192880 A revenue court hearing a suit under Section 209 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act may award damages where the substantive provision contemplates ejectment and damages, even if the original Schedule entry omitted express reference to damages. Concurrent factual findings that the defendants were trespassers and were not in possession with the plaintiff's consent are treated as findings of fact and are not ordinarily open to interference. A later procedural amendment making the State a necessary party was not applied so as to unsettle a decree already obtained and pending in appeal, and the absence of the State did not defeat the appeal or disturb the accrued position. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192880