https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192878 Territorial jurisdiction could not be reopened after the earlier appellate finding that the trial court had jurisdiction, absent demonstrated prejudice under the Code of Civil Procedure. The appellate court was also competent under Section 107 CPC to decide the appeal finally, so remittal was not required merely because the plaint had been returned. On recovery, objections based on unpleaded grounds were not entertained, the certificate was treated as duly proved, and no prior inquiry was held necessary before issuance. Amounts recoverable as arrears of land revenue under the governing recovery framework could be enforced through the ordinary revenue machinery, so the certificate, proclamation, and sale proceedings were upheld. en-us Thu, 26 Jun 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Jun 2017 16:20:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192878 Territorial jurisdiction could not be reopened after the earlier appellate finding that the trial court had jurisdiction, absent demonstrated prejudice under the Code of Civil Procedure. The appellate court was also competent under Section 107 CPC to decide the appeal finally, so remittal was not required merely because the plaint had been returned. On recovery, objections based on unpleaded grounds were not entertained, the certificate was treated as duly proved, and no prior inquiry was held necessary before issuance. Amounts recoverable as arrears of land revenue under the governing recovery framework could be enforced through the ordinary revenue machinery, so the certificate, proclamation, and sale proceedings were upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 26 Jun 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192878