<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (4) TMI 29 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8538</link>
    <description>An order under section 23A of the Income-tax Act, 1922, as amended by the Finance Act, 1955, directing payment of additional super-tax is not an assessment order within section 34(3). The Supreme Court&#039;s ruling on that point was applied to hold that the limitation period prescribed for assessment orders does not govern proceedings under section 23A. As a result, an order under the amended section 23A is not barred by the four-year limitation in section 34(3) and may be made after the expiry of that period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (4) TMI 29 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8538</link>
      <description>An order under section 23A of the Income-tax Act, 1922, as amended by the Finance Act, 1955, directing payment of additional super-tax is not an assessment order within section 34(3). The Supreme Court&#039;s ruling on that point was applied to hold that the limitation period prescribed for assessment orders does not govern proceedings under section 23A. As a result, an order under the amended section 23A is not barred by the four-year limitation in section 34(3) and may be made after the expiry of that period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>