<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 1216 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192877</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 15 lacs for cash deposits under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found the explanation provided by the assessee regarding the cash withdrawals and redeposits to be satisfactory, following a precedent set by the Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court. The addition was deemed unjustified under section 68 of the Act, leading to the successful appeal by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2017 12:20:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=475800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 1216 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192877</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 15 lacs for cash deposits under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found the explanation provided by the assessee regarding the cash withdrawals and redeposits to be satisfactory, following a precedent set by the Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court. The addition was deemed unjustified under section 68 of the Act, leading to the successful appeal by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>