<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1084 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344813</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging concurrent findings of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal regarding international transactions with an associate enterprise was dismissed. The appellant&#039;s arguments on arm&#039;s length pricing, applicability of Section 92C(2), and the comparison of companies were not accepted. The Tribunal&#039;s evaluation of the appellant&#039;s operating margin within the arm&#039;s length range led to the dismissal of the appeal due to the absence of substantial questions of law. The appeal was dismissed without costs, emphasizing that new grounds not raised before lower authorities cannot be introduced in the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=475746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1084 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344813</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging concurrent findings of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal regarding international transactions with an associate enterprise was dismissed. The appellant&#039;s arguments on arm&#039;s length pricing, applicability of Section 92C(2), and the comparison of companies were not accepted. The Tribunal&#039;s evaluation of the appellant&#039;s operating margin within the arm&#039;s length range led to the dismissal of the appeal due to the absence of substantial questions of law. The appeal was dismissed without costs, emphasizing that new grounds not raised before lower authorities cannot be introduced in the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>