<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1072 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344801</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that charges listed from Serial Nos. V to XX are not liable to be included in the taxable consideration. Errors in quantification of taxable value were noted, and the Original Authority was directed to rectify totaling mistakes. The case was remanded for reexamination of the limitation period. Errors in the final order dated 08/07/2016, including references to penalty under Section 76 and the &quot;Custom Department,&quot; were acknowledged and corrected. The Tribunal emphasized rectifying errors apparent on record and provided directions for denovo adjudication by the primary adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=475734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1072 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344801</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that charges listed from Serial Nos. V to XX are not liable to be included in the taxable consideration. Errors in quantification of taxable value were noted, and the Original Authority was directed to rectify totaling mistakes. The case was remanded for reexamination of the limitation period. Errors in the final order dated 08/07/2016, including references to penalty under Section 76 and the &quot;Custom Department,&quot; were acknowledged and corrected. The Tribunal emphasized rectifying errors apparent on record and provided directions for denovo adjudication by the primary adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>