<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1070 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344799</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the show cause notice for the extended period of limitation was not sustainable due to the lack of evidence of suppression or contumacious conduct. The decision emphasizes the significance of maintaining accurate records and transparency in business dealings to mitigate tax obligations and conflicts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2017 08:25:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=475732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1070 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344799</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the show cause notice for the extended period of limitation was not sustainable due to the lack of evidence of suppression or contumacious conduct. The decision emphasizes the significance of maintaining accurate records and transparency in business dealings to mitigate tax obligations and conflicts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>