<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1061 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344790</link>
    <description>The High Court granted the petitioner&#039;s mandamus request to enforce the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order setting aside the cancellation of their CHA license. The court directed the petitioner to appear before the respondents for further orders, emphasizing compliance for necessary actions. The renewal of the license was acknowledged, but the petitioner was not permitted to operate as a custom house agent pending the appeal challenging the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The writ petition was disposed of with instructions for the petitioner to appear before the respondents by a specified deadline, with outcomes subject to the pending appeal. No costs were imposed on either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2017 08:24:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=475723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1061 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344790</link>
      <description>The High Court granted the petitioner&#039;s mandamus request to enforce the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order setting aside the cancellation of their CHA license. The court directed the petitioner to appear before the respondents for further orders, emphasizing compliance for necessary actions. The renewal of the license was acknowledged, but the petitioner was not permitted to operate as a custom house agent pending the appeal challenging the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The writ petition was disposed of with instructions for the petitioner to appear before the respondents by a specified deadline, with outcomes subject to the pending appeal. No costs were imposed on either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>