https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344788 Bronopol imported for claimed non-insecticidal use remained within the statutory scheme under the Insecticides Act, 1968, because the Section 38(1)(b) exemption applies only where the importer proves the substance is intended for a purpose other than preventing, destroying, repelling or mitigating pests. That exemption is not automatic and requires supporting evidence of end use. A DGFT notification issued under the foreign trade regime was treated as binding law, and it required an import permit from the Registration Committee even for imports said to be for non-insecticidal purposes. The Act was also read as operating alongside other laws. en-us Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Nov 2017 17:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344788 Bronopol imported for claimed non-insecticidal use remained within the statutory scheme under the Insecticides Act, 1968, because the Section 38(1)(b) exemption applies only where the importer proves the substance is intended for a purpose other than preventing, destroying, repelling or mitigating pests. That exemption is not automatic and requires supporting evidence of end use. A DGFT notification issued under the foreign trade regime was treated as binding law, and it required an import permit from the Registration Committee even for imports said to be for non-insecticidal purposes. The Act was also read as operating alongside other laws. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344788