https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344783 The Tribunal held that the Customs Department lacked jurisdiction within the Special Economic Zone (SEZ) to confiscate goods, including gold bars, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal. The Tribunal relied on the Meenakshi International case, establishing that Customs did not have authority to confiscate goods within the SEZ area. Consequently, the Customs proceedings for confiscation, penalties, and redemption fine were deemed invalid, leading to the disposal of the appeals in favor of the appellants. en-us Mon, 15 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Jun 2017 10:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344783 The Tribunal held that the Customs Department lacked jurisdiction within the Special Economic Zone (SEZ) to confiscate goods, including gold bars, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal. The Tribunal relied on the Meenakshi International case, establishing that Customs did not have authority to confiscate goods within the SEZ area. Consequently, the Customs proceedings for confiscation, penalties, and redemption fine were deemed invalid, leading to the disposal of the appeals in favor of the appellants. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 15 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344783