https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192871 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the deletion of disallowance u/s.14A r.w.r 8D, as the Revenue failed to prove the expenditure incurred by the assessee for earning exempt income. In another issue, the Tribunal remitted the deduction u/s.54F claim back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration due to discrepancies in handling the case, specifically regarding investments made by the assessee. The appeal was dismissed in one case and partly allowed for statistical purposes in the other. en-us Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Jun 2017 08:23:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192871 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the deletion of disallowance u/s.14A r.w.r 8D, as the Revenue failed to prove the expenditure incurred by the assessee for earning exempt income. In another issue, the Tribunal remitted the deduction u/s.54F claim back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration due to discrepancies in handling the case, specifically regarding investments made by the assessee. The appeal was dismissed in one case and partly allowed for statistical purposes in the other. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192871