https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192867 Rule 268 of the Madras Vehicles Rules, 1940 was treated as a valid exercise of statutory rule-making power under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, because it authorized regulation of where stage carriages may pick up or set down passengers, including the notification or shifting of bus stands, without conflicting with municipal law. The restriction on use of the stand was held not to infringe Article 19(1)(g), since it regulated only the place of business in the interest of public convenience and did not bar the business altogether. The challenge based on consultation, mala fides, and bias also failed because consultation with the Municipality was shown and no supporting material established improper motive. en-us Fri, 05 Dec 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Jun 2017 18:33:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192867 Rule 268 of the Madras Vehicles Rules, 1940 was treated as a valid exercise of statutory rule-making power under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, because it authorized regulation of where stage carriages may pick up or set down passengers, including the notification or shifting of bus stands, without conflicting with municipal law. The restriction on use of the stand was held not to infringe Article 19(1)(g), since it regulated only the place of business in the interest of public convenience and did not bar the business altogether. The challenge based on consultation, mala fides, and bias also failed because consultation with the Municipality was shown and no supporting material established improper motive. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Dec 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192867