<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1049 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344778</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s deletion of an addition under Section 69B was sustained because the Revenue&#039;s comparable sales were of commercial properties, while the property in question was a residential flat. The assessee&#039;s explanation that the flat had remained vacant for a long period, had an ill-reputed condition, and was subject to a municipal notice for illegal possession was accepted as plausible, with the sale agreement also on record. The reasoning proceeded on the basis that the initial burden rested on the Revenue and that the explanation had to be assessed objectively. On that appraisal, the addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 15:53:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=475640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1049 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344778</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s deletion of an addition under Section 69B was sustained because the Revenue&#039;s comparable sales were of commercial properties, while the property in question was a residential flat. The assessee&#039;s explanation that the flat had remained vacant for a long period, had an ill-reputed condition, and was subject to a municipal notice for illegal possession was accepted as plausible, with the sale agreement also on record. The reasoning proceeded on the basis that the initial burden rested on the Revenue and that the explanation had to be assessed objectively. On that appraisal, the addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>