<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (11) TMI 18 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8514</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s application seeking a reference under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding the imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c). The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty, emphasizing the lack of positive evidence of concealment of income by the department. The judgment highlighted the department&#039;s burden to prove concealment in penalty proceedings, citing precedents to clarify the penal nature of penalties and the distinction between tax and penalty. The refusal to refer the case was justified based on the Tribunal&#039;s factual finding that no concealment was established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (11) TMI 18 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8514</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s application seeking a reference under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding the imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c). The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty, emphasizing the lack of positive evidence of concealment of income by the department. The judgment highlighted the department&#039;s burden to prove concealment in penalty proceedings, citing precedents to clarify the penal nature of penalties and the distinction between tax and penalty. The refusal to refer the case was justified based on the Tribunal&#039;s factual finding that no concealment was established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>