<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1017 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344746</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 8/2002 for clearance of black and white television sets could not be denied merely because Cenvat credit had been availed in relation to colour television sets. The record contained no clear finding that credit was taken for inputs used in the manufacture of the exempt black and white televisions, so the alleged breach of exemption conditions was not established. In the absence of a specific nexus between the credit availed and the exempt goods, denial of the exemption was unsustainable. The demand, penalty and interest therefore did not survive, and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 09:31:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=475447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1017 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344746</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 8/2002 for clearance of black and white television sets could not be denied merely because Cenvat credit had been availed in relation to colour television sets. The record contained no clear finding that credit was taken for inputs used in the manufacture of the exempt black and white televisions, so the alleged breach of exemption conditions was not established. In the absence of a specific nexus between the credit availed and the exempt goods, denial of the exemption was unsustainable. The demand, penalty and interest therefore did not survive, and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>