<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1011 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344740</link>
    <description>Classification of imported cartridges turned on the physical nature of the goods, and the existing record was not sufficient to determine whether they were rifle cartridges or revolver cartridges. Because the controversy required sampling of the consignment and technical opinion from an authorised expert, the matter was sent back for fresh adjudication. The original authority was directed to obtain samples, secure expert testing, and decide the issue afresh after giving all parties an effective opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 09:31:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=475441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1011 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344740</link>
      <description>Classification of imported cartridges turned on the physical nature of the goods, and the existing record was not sufficient to determine whether they were rifle cartridges or revolver cartridges. Because the controversy required sampling of the consignment and technical opinion from an authorised expert, the matter was sent back for fresh adjudication. The original authority was directed to obtain samples, secure expert testing, and decide the issue afresh after giving all parties an effective opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>