<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1009 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344738</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case concerning the valuation for additional duty on imported Digital Set Top Boxes. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the valuation methodology used by Customs, emphasizing the need for a fresh assessment based on the actual retail sale price to consumers. The matter was remanded back to the original authority for a detailed reevaluation, granting the appellant an opportunity to present their case effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 09:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=475439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1009 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344738</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case concerning the valuation for additional duty on imported Digital Set Top Boxes. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the valuation methodology used by Customs, emphasizing the need for a fresh assessment based on the actual retail sale price to consumers. The matter was remanded back to the original authority for a detailed reevaluation, granting the appellant an opportunity to present their case effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>