<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (11) TMI 37 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8499</link>
    <description>An assessee carrying on multiple businesses may set off a loss from one business against profits of another under section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1922, because tax is charged on the aggregate business profits and losses of the assessee. Section 24(1) does not control such intra-assessee adjustment. Applying the Supreme Court ruling in Muthuraman Chettiar, the Punjab and Haryana High Court treated the facts as identical and rejected the department&#039;s attempt to distinguish the loss on the ground that it arose in a firm, since the claim was made by the Hindu undivided family in its own assessment. The set-off was therefore allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (11) TMI 37 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8499</link>
      <description>An assessee carrying on multiple businesses may set off a loss from one business against profits of another under section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1922, because tax is charged on the aggregate business profits and losses of the assessee. Section 24(1) does not control such intra-assessee adjustment. Applying the Supreme Court ruling in Muthuraman Chettiar, the Punjab and Haryana High Court treated the facts as identical and rejected the department&#039;s attempt to distinguish the loss on the ground that it arose in a firm, since the claim was made by the Hindu undivided family in its own assessment. The set-off was therefore allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>