<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (3) TMI 102 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192852</link>
    <description>Rule 50(b) of the Bombay Civil Services Rules is explained as treating deputation service as countable service for increments in the lien post and as supporting restoration of the employee to the position he would have occupied in the parent department had deputation not occurred. The accompanying circular is described as reflecting that approach. The note rejects a narrow reading that would confine the benefit only to increments in the original post. It also states that deputation does not create an automatic right to promotion, but where promotion in the parent department depends on seniority-cum-merit, satisfactory deputation service and promotions earned there may be considered consistently with the rule.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2017 18:12:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=475419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (3) TMI 102 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192852</link>
      <description>Rule 50(b) of the Bombay Civil Services Rules is explained as treating deputation service as countable service for increments in the lien post and as supporting restoration of the employee to the position he would have occupied in the parent department had deputation not occurred. The accompanying circular is described as reflecting that approach. The note rejects a narrow reading that would confine the benefit only to increments in the original post. It also states that deputation does not create an automatic right to promotion, but where promotion in the parent department depends on seniority-cum-merit, satisfactory deputation service and promotions earned there may be considered consistently with the rule.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>