https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192850 The Supreme Court held that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain appeals and writ petitions from Pondicherry as Pondicherry was not considered part of the territory of India under Article 1(3) of the Constitution. The Court suggested that the Government of India could address the issue through appropriate legislative measures. Consequently, the appeals and writ petitions were dismissed, with parties to bear their own costs. en-us Fri, 08 Dec 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Jun 2017 17:40:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192850 The Supreme Court held that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain appeals and writ petitions from Pondicherry as Pondicherry was not considered part of the territory of India under Article 1(3) of the Constitution. The Court suggested that the Government of India could address the issue through appropriate legislative measures. Consequently, the appeals and writ petitions were dismissed, with parties to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Dec 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192850