<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 729 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192846</link>
    <description>Valuation of dutiable clearances required fresh examination because the assessee disputed the figures adopted and produced records indicating a lower clearance value. The benefit of small scale industry exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. had been accepted, so duty computation had to be reworked on the correct clearance figures and the applicable exemption. The original authority was directed to reconsider the valuation, duty and consequential penalty de novo after granting the assessee an opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2017 16:21:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=475314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 729 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192846</link>
      <description>Valuation of dutiable clearances required fresh examination because the assessee disputed the figures adopted and produced records indicating a lower clearance value. The benefit of small scale industry exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. had been accepted, so duty computation had to be reworked on the correct clearance figures and the applicable exemption. The original authority was directed to reconsider the valuation, duty and consequential penalty de novo after granting the assessee an opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>