<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (12) TMI 6 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8472</link>
    <description>Rectification of a partner&#039;s completed assessment cannot be used to reconsider whether the partner was actively engaged in a firm&#039;s business and thereby recharacterise share income from earned to unearned income. The relevant rectification provision permits amendment where a firm&#039;s assessment reveals omission or incorrect inclusion of the partner&#039;s share, but does not permit a fresh determination of a debatable factual issue requiring inquiry beyond the record. Evidence of business visits, daily reports, prior earned-income relief and past departmental treatment reinforced that the issue was unsuitable for summary rectification. Special surcharge could therefore not be imposed through rectification on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (12) TMI 6 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8472</link>
      <description>Rectification of a partner&#039;s completed assessment cannot be used to reconsider whether the partner was actively engaged in a firm&#039;s business and thereby recharacterise share income from earned to unearned income. The relevant rectification provision permits amendment where a firm&#039;s assessment reveals omission or incorrect inclusion of the partner&#039;s share, but does not permit a fresh determination of a debatable factual issue requiring inquiry beyond the record. Evidence of business visits, daily reports, prior earned-income relief and past departmental treatment reinforced that the issue was unsuitable for summary rectification. Special surcharge could therefore not be imposed through rectification on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>