<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (8) TMI 27 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8467</link>
    <description>Initial depreciation under section 10(2)(vi) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 was held to form part of the depreciation actually allowed for computing written down value under section 10(5)(b) and for applying the second proviso to section 10(2)(vii). The exclusion of initial depreciation operated only for calculating depreciation under section 10(2)(vi) and did not require it to be ignored when determining the statutory recovery on sale. The scheme treated the sale difference as a recovery of depreciation previously allowed, so the written down value had to include initial depreciation. The issue was answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (8) TMI 27 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8467</link>
      <description>Initial depreciation under section 10(2)(vi) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 was held to form part of the depreciation actually allowed for computing written down value under section 10(5)(b) and for applying the second proviso to section 10(2)(vii). The exclusion of initial depreciation operated only for calculating depreciation under section 10(2)(vi) and did not require it to be ignored when determining the statutory recovery on sale. The scheme treated the sale difference as a recovery of depreciation previously allowed, so the written down value had to include initial depreciation. The issue was answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>