<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (8) TMI 64 -  DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8464</link>
    <description>The court allowed the deduction of the commission paid to S. R. Dhodi, finding it incurred for the business&#039;s purposes and thus deductible under Section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It held that Section 67(3) was not exhaustive and should be harmoniously construed with Section 37 to permit such deductions. The court referred to precedents supporting this interpretation and directed parties to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (8) TMI 64 -  DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8464</link>
      <description>The court allowed the deduction of the commission paid to S. R. Dhodi, finding it incurred for the business&#039;s purposes and thus deductible under Section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It held that Section 67(3) was not exhaustive and should be harmoniously construed with Section 37 to permit such deductions. The court referred to precedents supporting this interpretation and directed parties to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>