https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344729 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging orders by the Appellate Authority and CESTAT. The primary issue was the timeliness of the appeal due to delayed service of the original order. The petitioner also raised concerns about the mode of service via speed post not being valid under the Central Excise Act. The Court addressed the petitioner's arguments on natural justice, compliance with deposit directives, and the binding nature of larger Bench decisions. Ultimately, the Court found no substantial irregularities in the decision-making processes, leading to the dismissal of the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. en-us Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Jan 2018 11:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344729 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging orders by the Appellate Authority and CESTAT. The primary issue was the timeliness of the appeal due to delayed service of the original order. The petitioner also raised concerns about the mode of service via speed post not being valid under the Central Excise Act. The Court addressed the petitioner's arguments on natural justice, compliance with deposit directives, and the binding nature of larger Bench decisions. Ultimately, the Court found no substantial irregularities in the decision-making processes, leading to the dismissal of the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344729