<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 998 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344727</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case for reconsideration after a decision by the Larger Bench. The conflicting views on interest liability under the Central Excise Act required clarification for consistency in legal interpretations. The matter was deemed significant, pending resolution by the Larger Bench, necessitating a fresh decision based on the final judicial pronouncement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2017 12:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=475043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 998 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344727</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case for reconsideration after a decision by the Larger Bench. The conflicting views on interest liability under the Central Excise Act required clarification for consistency in legal interpretations. The matter was deemed significant, pending resolution by the Larger Bench, necessitating a fresh decision based on the final judicial pronouncement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>