https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344725 The Tribunal upheld the clubbing of clearances of two separate firms based on evidence of interdependence and financial flow between them, despite the appellant's arguments emphasizing their separate nature. However, the Tribunal set aside the charge of clandestine clearances without payment of duty due to lack of evidentiary value in the statements provided, remanding the case for re-quantification of the demand. The judgment extensively analyzed the legal principles and evidentiary considerations involved in the case. en-us Wed, 21 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Aug 2017 17:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344725 The Tribunal upheld the clubbing of clearances of two separate firms based on evidence of interdependence and financial flow between them, despite the appellant's arguments emphasizing their separate nature. However, the Tribunal set aside the charge of clandestine clearances without payment of duty due to lack of evidentiary value in the statements provided, remanding the case for re-quantification of the demand. The judgment extensively analyzed the legal principles and evidentiary considerations involved in the case. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 21 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344725