<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 995 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344724</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal challenging duty demand and penalties imposed for under-invoicing goods and undervaluing scrap, resulting in unaccounted cash. The Tribunal found evidence supporting the allegations, including under-invoiced money received through bearer cheques and unaccounted cash from scrap sales. Despite the Commissioner (Appeals) setting aside personal penalties, the Tribunal upheld the duty demand and penalties, concluding the appeal lacked merit based on the evidence presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 10:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=475040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 995 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344724</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal challenging duty demand and penalties imposed for under-invoicing goods and undervaluing scrap, resulting in unaccounted cash. The Tribunal found evidence supporting the allegations, including under-invoiced money received through bearer cheques and unaccounted cash from scrap sales. Despite the Commissioner (Appeals) setting aside personal penalties, the Tribunal upheld the duty demand and penalties, concluding the appeal lacked merit based on the evidence presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>