https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35354 Revision u/s 264 - period of limitation - The petitioner had applied before the AO u/s 154 within four years of the order sought to be corrected. The petitioner did not delay in filing the petition u/s 264 beyond the prescribed of one year from the date of passing of the order u/s 154 by the AO - HC en-us Sat, 24 Jun 2017 18:02:12 +0530 Sat, 24 Jun 2017 18:02:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35354 Revision u/s 264 - period of limitation - The petitioner had applied before the AO u/s 154 within four years of the order sought to be corrected. The petitioner did not delay in filing the petition u/s 264 beyond the prescribed of one year from the date of passing of the order u/s 154 by the AO - HC Highlights Income Tax Sat, 24 Jun 2017 18:02:12 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35354