<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 979 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344708</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the assessee regarding the disallowance of interest expenses, considering legitimate expenditures for earning income and the company&#039;s capital structure. The decision was based on Section 57 of the Income Tax Act, allowing deductions for expenditures laid out wholly and exclusively for earning income from other sources. The Tribunal referenced various judgments, including the Apex Court decision in CIT vs. Rajendra Prasad Modi, and calculated the interest disallowance accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2017 08:08:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=474812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 979 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344708</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the assessee regarding the disallowance of interest expenses, considering legitimate expenditures for earning income and the company&#039;s capital structure. The decision was based on Section 57 of the Income Tax Act, allowing deductions for expenditures laid out wholly and exclusively for earning income from other sources. The Tribunal referenced various judgments, including the Apex Court decision in CIT vs. Rajendra Prasad Modi, and calculated the interest disallowance accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>