https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344704 The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order that rejected the service tax credit on input services related to the sale of cars and servicing activities. The Tribunal found that the appellant, as a provider of output service, could delegate servicing to another dealer without affecting the eligibility for CENVAT credit. Relying on previous judicial precedents and subsequent decisions, the Tribunal concluded that the rejection of the credit was not sustainable and allowed the appeal with consequential reliefs. en-us Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Jun 2017 08:08:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344704 The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order that rejected the service tax credit on input services related to the sale of cars and servicing activities. The Tribunal found that the appellant, as a provider of output service, could delegate servicing to another dealer without affecting the eligibility for CENVAT credit. Relying on previous judicial precedents and subsequent decisions, the Tribunal concluded that the rejection of the credit was not sustainable and allowed the appeal with consequential reliefs. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344704