<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 964 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344693</link>
    <description>The court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962, which mandates a pre-deposit for filing an appeal. The court found the provision reasonable and not discriminatory, emphasizing the need to expedite appeals and reduce litigation. The challenge to the Order-in-Original was left open for the petitioners to pursue before the appellate authority. The court dismissed the writ petitions, concluding that they lacked merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=474797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 964 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344693</link>
      <description>The court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962, which mandates a pre-deposit for filing an appeal. The court found the provision reasonable and not discriminatory, emphasizing the need to expedite appeals and reduce litigation. The challenge to the Order-in-Original was left open for the petitioners to pursue before the appellate authority. The court dismissed the writ petitions, concluding that they lacked merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>