<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 962 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344691</link>
    <description>The tribunal found a gross violation of natural justice in the case involving the mis-declaration of iron &amp;amp; steel products as scrap, leading to duty demand and penalties. The High Court allowed provisional release, but subsequent investigations revealed conflicting opinions on the goods&#039; quality. The appellant successfully argued against value enhancement, citing a Chartered Engineer&#039;s report and challenging the validity of a market survey. Emphasizing fair proceedings and the right to cross-examine witnesses, the tribunal set aside the order and remanded the case for proper adjudication in accordance with the Customs Act, keeping all issues open for reconsideration within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=474795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 962 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344691</link>
      <description>The tribunal found a gross violation of natural justice in the case involving the mis-declaration of iron &amp;amp; steel products as scrap, leading to duty demand and penalties. The High Court allowed provisional release, but subsequent investigations revealed conflicting opinions on the goods&#039; quality. The appellant successfully argued against value enhancement, citing a Chartered Engineer&#039;s report and challenging the validity of a market survey. Emphasizing fair proceedings and the right to cross-examine witnesses, the tribunal set aside the order and remanded the case for proper adjudication in accordance with the Customs Act, keeping all issues open for reconsideration within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>