<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 957 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344686</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the penalties imposed by the Special Director of Enforcement, Delhi, on a company and its Managing Director under Section 13 of FEMA. The penalties were reinstated as the company was found to be in violation of FEMA for not taking necessary steps to realize and repatriate foreign exchange. The Court dismissed the company&#039;s petition seeking a refund of the pre-deposited penalty amount, emphasizing non-compliance with FEMA provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 15:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=474790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 957 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344686</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the penalties imposed by the Special Director of Enforcement, Delhi, on a company and its Managing Director under Section 13 of FEMA. The penalties were reinstated as the company was found to be in violation of FEMA for not taking necessary steps to realize and repatriate foreign exchange. The Court dismissed the company&#039;s petition seeking a refund of the pre-deposited penalty amount, emphasizing non-compliance with FEMA provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>