<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1175 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192838</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, directing the deletion of additions made under Section 69B and for unaccounted interest for the respective assessment years. The Tribunal found no justification for the additions based on lack of corroborative evidence linking the assessee to transactions with Shri Shreeram H. Soni. Consequently, all three appeals filed by the assessee were partly allowed, with the Tribunal overturning the additions made by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2017 08:05:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=474787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1175 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192838</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, directing the deletion of additions made under Section 69B and for unaccounted interest for the respective assessment years. The Tribunal found no justification for the additions based on lack of corroborative evidence linking the assessee to transactions with Shri Shreeram H. Soni. Consequently, all three appeals filed by the assessee were partly allowed, with the Tribunal overturning the additions made by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>