<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (4) TMI 25 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8431</link>
    <description>Section 50 of the Estate Duty Act is a beneficial deduction provision intended to give credit for probate duty paid in obtaining representation to an estate, and the word &quot;paid&quot; was construed to include duty actually discharged even after estate duty assessment. Relief was therefore not barred where probate duty, or additional probate duty on revision, became payable later. The claim under section 50 was also not confined to rectification under section 61, because it did not reopen the completed assessment but only worked out the consequential deduction and refund. Limitation under section 61 did not defeat the statutory relief, which remained available on its own terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (4) TMI 25 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8431</link>
      <description>Section 50 of the Estate Duty Act is a beneficial deduction provision intended to give credit for probate duty paid in obtaining representation to an estate, and the word &quot;paid&quot; was construed to include duty actually discharged even after estate duty assessment. Relief was therefore not barred where probate duty, or additional probate duty on revision, became payable later. The claim under section 50 was also not confined to rectification under section 61, because it did not reopen the completed assessment but only worked out the consequential deduction and refund. Limitation under section 61 did not defeat the statutory relief, which remained available on its own terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>