<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (9) TMI 36 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8427</link>
    <description>Rectification power cannot be used to change the identity of the assessee by substituting a Hindu undivided family where the original assessment was made on an association of individuals holding property as tenants-in-common. The Act treats an individual, Hindu undivided family, association of individuals, firm and company as separate assessable units, and a mistake apparent from the record does not extend to replacing one taxable entity with another that was never assessed. If the authority believed the Hindu undivided family had escaped assessment, the proper remedy was escaped-assessment proceedings, not rectification. The rectification order substituting the Hindu undivided family was therefore without jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (9) TMI 36 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8427</link>
      <description>Rectification power cannot be used to change the identity of the assessee by substituting a Hindu undivided family where the original assessment was made on an association of individuals holding property as tenants-in-common. The Act treats an individual, Hindu undivided family, association of individuals, firm and company as separate assessable units, and a mistake apparent from the record does not extend to replacing one taxable entity with another that was never assessed. If the authority believed the Hindu undivided family had escaped assessment, the proper remedy was escaped-assessment proceedings, not rectification. The rectification order substituting the Hindu undivided family was therefore without jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>