<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (12) TMI 32 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8423</link>
    <description>The court determined that the expenditure of Rs. 42,542 was of a capital nature as it resulted in an enduring advantage for the business. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was largely upheld, except for a portion deemed to be for repairs. The court ruled against the assessee, affirming the capital nature of the expenditure and denying any costs to be awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (12) TMI 32 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8423</link>
      <description>The court determined that the expenditure of Rs. 42,542 was of a capital nature as it resulted in an enduring advantage for the business. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was largely upheld, except for a portion deemed to be for repairs. The court ruled against the assessee, affirming the capital nature of the expenditure and denying any costs to be awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>